Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Our aloes are finally flowering—and how!

All things come to those who wait, they say. It certainly took a while this year for the flowers on our aloes to open. I'm convinced the inconsistent weather—cool, unseaonably warm, cool, rainy, cold—got the plants all confused. But finally, after almost two months of impatient waiting on my part, the aloes planted in the strip along the street are at their peak.

Aloe excelsa (first two photos) is flowering for the first time, and our three Aloe 'Moonlight' (orange-yellow flowers) have never had so many inflorescences. Exciting times indeed!

Let's take a look!

Aloe excelsa blooming for the first time


Aloe excelsa 

Aloe excelsa (left), Aloe 'Moonshine' (right)

This is the first of three clumps of Aloe 'Moonshine' we have now. They all came from the same mother—one of two plants in a #5 can (a friend of mine got the second plant in the pot). What a deal, considering all our 'Moonglow' cost us less than $10 in total.

Aloe ferox, bigger than ever

Aloe ferox wasn't satisfied with the large flower stalk on the left so it pushed a second one from the center

Aloe ferox; the tree behind the fence is Acacia baileyana 'Purpurea'

Aloe 'Moonglow', clump #2. The tall aloe is Aloidendron 'Hercules'; it's still much too small to flower.

Aloe 'Moonglow', clump #2

Aloe hereroensis

Aloe hereroensis flowers are truly spectacular

Aloe hereroensis flower up close

Aloe capitata var. quartziticola

Aloe capitata var. quartziticola. What can I say? It's still my favorite aloe.

Aloe capitata var. quartziticola

From left to right: Aloe ferox, Aloe 'Moonglow', Aloe capitata var. quartziticola, Aloe glauca

On the right: Aloe 'Erik the Red'

Aloe 'Erik the Red'. It has the reddest flowers of any aloe I've ever seen. And they haven't even opened up yet!

I take back what I said about Aloe capitata var. quartziticola being my favorite aloe. That honor goes to Aloe 'Erik the Red'. At least at the moment.

Aloe 'Erik the Red' and Aloe 'Moonglow', clump #3

Aloe 'Moonglow', clump #3

Aloe 'Moonglow', clump #3. The yellow-flowering shrublet in front of it is the dwarf bush marigold I brought back from Southern California (a hybrid between Tagetes lemmonii and Tagetes lucida called 'Gold Medal').

Aloe 'Moonglow', clump #3

Since the weather continues to be on the cool side (the highest daytime high I see in the 7-day forecast is 61°F), I expect these aloe flowers to last another few weeks. I'll be sad to see them go. Although by then spring might be here for real.
© 2017 Gerhard Bock, http://ift.tt/1l5MlEA


from Succulents and More http://ift.tt/2oF91kw
via IFTTT

Teams At The NFL Combine Are Asking Prospects Some Very Strange Questions

Wide receiver Chris Conley gets ready to run the 40-yard dash during the 2015 NFL Scouting Combine. Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images.

As long as there’s been an NFL draft, teams have adopted tactics to ensure their selections are prepared for success — both physically and mentally. While players’ physical pedigrees are proven during their college careers, the psychological aspects have proven far more elusive, turning the league’s pre-draft player evaluations into surreal interviews, and featuring questions that would never fly at a cocktail party … or anywhere else for that matter. 

Execs and scouts use seemingly random questions to get inside the heads of the players they’re sizing up, doing their best to ensure they’re drafting a player who displays as much mental fitness as they do physical prowess. 

The strange questions asked of players have turned into something of a trope over the years, and the collection of previously asked questions will cause you to wonder what’s going on in the interviewers’ minds, more so than those of the subjects. 

The questions below have all been asked of players in the previous NFL Combines, and while very little context is provided for the queries, it’s hard to imagine any circumstances that would make these questions appropriate, never mind useful, in the evaluation process. 

For instance, where on a player’s draft sheet do you mark down their response to this question? 

It would be fun to see a player’s response to this question pop up on a draft day graphic, too. 

The player tasked with answering this question no doubt sweated while trying to figure out which was the “right” answer. 

Most of us no better to pull at this thread, but all is (apparently) fair game in sizing up a draft pick. 

Unless this was posed by the equipment manager, it seems like a very inappropriate question as well. 

Again, I don’t understand the purpose here, but I feel like for a football player, “shark” is a safe answer. 

Given the questions asked, and the fact that NFL teams don’t appear to be any more or less successful with their draft picks following these nosy interviews, it’s little surprise that the whole psychological testing process is debunked and retooled on an almost annual basis. But that doesn’t keep teams from trying their best to get inside the heads of their prospective players. 



from GOOD http://ift.tt/2GSbwrh
via IFTTT

These Virtual Reality Sculptures Make Any Environment An Art Installation 

Los Angeles-based artist Nancy Baker Cahill recently released 4th Wall, an iOS app that allows audiences across the globe to view her drawings in their own environments through the wonders of augmented reality. With AR, they can become a part of many different environments, at least temporarily. Over the last few weeks, her work has turned up in some surprising places, a few of which have been documented on the app's Instagram feed. They've flown through the sky above Malawi, dangled over a London street, and floated down the Los Angeles River. One even traveled the baggage carousel at Los Angeles International Airport. With an app, Cahill's drawings can go anywhere. 

"It really is a new iteration of public art," says Cahill by phone. To create this project, the artist herself stepped inside AR's cousin, virtual reality.

Even when Cahill worked primarily in two dimensions, with graphite on paper, there was a sense that she aimed to engulf viewers in her drawings. Her work is abstract and often takes on grand shapes resembling storms and swarms. With 2D drawing, though, Cahill hit a creative block. She drew larger forms, but ultimately, was hindered by the size of her studio. She worked on a series of called "Surds," where she punctured holes and added lucite to drawings that resemble twisted limbs and knotted muscles. "It was playing with space and perception, but it wasn't going far enough," she says.

Then a colleague suggested that Cahill try virtual reality.

In recent years, the allure of virtual reality has captivated a broad swath of artists and developers. From college students to major film directors, like Jon Favreau and Alejandro Iñárritu, VR has become a tool to take viewers deeper into worlds that they might otherwise only see through screens. Cahill tried a variety of VR experiences and was smitten. "I just came out of it thinking, this is the perfect next step," she says. "This is exactly where the work needs to go." So, she stepped into VR as an artist with Tilt Brush, an app that enables people to draw and paint inside a headset.

"It's a somewhat ecstatic experience to draw in a three dimensional space," says Cahill. Yet, there were limitations, particularly as Cahill strived to keep the cohesiveness between her 3D drawings and her 2D ones. She hooked up with Drive Studios to develop brush strokes that could be used in the 3D work.

"I really wanted to create a fine art experience for the viewer," says Cahill. "I wanted you to engage with these drawings the same way that you would in a museum, a gallery, or anywhere where you have access to a work of art, where you're really led by your own curiosity."

Rian Brown Orso superimposes Cahill


She continues, "You decide how close or far away you want to be and, in this case, you can stand in the middle of it. You can literally stand in the middle of the drawing or you can walk through it. you can teleport through it. We developed a slow drift teleport as well, so you don't have to fly through the drawing. You can drift through the drawing."

Plus, Cahill found a conceptual connection between virtual reality and her drawings on paper. "The truth is, I had gone into this whole endeavor thinking that I was going to make one thing and learned, very quickly that it was the void, the intimate void in VR that is mirrored in paper. When you look at a piece of paper, it too represents a kind of void," she says. "All of my drawings represent a kind of moment of frozen tension in a void. So, it was this very natural translation to go into that same void and create forms and a kind of imagery that held that same tension, but allowed you to engage with it on a whole new level."

While Cahill draws in VR, she chose to release the finished pieces, four of which exist so far, in AR to reach the widest audience. While VR has gained popularity in recent years, a full immersive set-up for the home is still high-priced technology. There are spaces like IMAX VR popping up globally and some arts institutions have experimented with the technology, but that's not commonplace yet.

Taking VR-made art into an AR app is a complicated process that involves both the artist and her collaborators. Cahill says uses the word "build" to describe that process now, likening it to architecture and sculpture.

Nancy Baker Cahill at work in her studio. Photo by Michele Asselin.


She says that since starting this project, even the way she draws on paper has change. "More than affecting how I draw, it's changing how I perceive space on paper," she says. "There's a different kind of velocity now to the drawings, a different kind of motion and energy that wasn't there before. It's neither good nor bad, I'm not placing a value judgment on it, it's just interesting to see that happen."

Cahill recalls returning home after trying VR for the first time and being disappointed with the flatness of images on a television set. "It was that persuasive, that profound," she says. That realization prompted her to deeply consider how she uses both VR and AR. "I feel compelled to use it in interesting and innovative, but, most importantly, responsible ways," she says. "I really want to carve out new territories that are positive."

 



from GOOD http://ift.tt/2F13iAB
via IFTTT

Issue #53: ANIMAL

There are no plants without animals, and no animals without plants. Yep, we’re all in the lumpy, bumpy soup of life together. This month we’re exploring the relationship between feathers, fur, skin and scales and foliage, bark, flowers and photosynthesis. We’re talking wasps and orchids, dogs and plants, keeping animals away and drawing them in and all sorts of other animalistic ideas. Woof woof.

The post Issue #53: ANIMAL appeared first on The Planthunter.



from The Planthunter http://ift.tt/2FJiLT3
via IFTTT

At EPA’s San Francisco hearing, hundreds defend the Clean Power Plan

Magnificent spiraling hives are built by stingless sugarbag bees (Video)

Boring old bee hives get exciting with these curly shaped structures, built by bees that don't sting.

from Latest Items from TreeHugger http://ift.tt/2oDYDte
via IFTTT

Dick’s Sporting Goods Pulling Assault Rifles From Shelves And Wants Them Banned Altogether

Photo by Robyn Beck/Getty Images.

THE GOOD NEWS:

One of the nation’s biggest gun retailers is putting its money where its mouth is, and taking a real stand against gun violence.

After every mass shooting since Columbine in 1999, many have looked to their elected officials to do something about the violence, and they’ve achieved virtually nothing. But after a gunman killed 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, on Feb. 14, things are beginning to look different. 

While U.S. politicians are spinning their wheels and suggesting ridiculous fixes for the country’s mass shooting epidemic, its youth are speaking out, and some of its biggest businesses are taking action.

Since the shooting, dozens of companies have cut ties with the National Rifle Association (NRA), including: First National Bank of Omaha, United Airlines, Hertz, MetLife, and Symantec. Now, Dick’s Sporting Goods, one of America’s largest gun retailers (and GOOD Sports sponsor), is permanently removing assault-style rifles from the shelves of at more than 715 locations. It’s also requiring all customers to be older than 21 to buy a firearm, and stopped selling high-capacity magazines.

Dick’s Sporting Goods stopped selling assault-style rifles in 2012 after the Sandy Hook shooting. But the retail giant will also be pulling them from the shelves at its Field & Stream locations. 

The company also taking a huge risk by taking a side in the country’s fierce control debate. Dick’s released a statement imploring elected officials to enact common sense gun reform and pass the following regulations:

— Ban assault-style firearms
— Raise the minimum age to purchase firearms to 21
— Ban high capacity magazines and bump stocks
— Require universal background checks that include relevant mental health information and previous interactions with the law
— Ensure a complete universal database of those banned from buying firearms
— Close the private sale and gun show loophole that waives the necessity of background checks

Dick’s CEO Ed Stack announced the decision on ABC’s Good Morning America on Wednesday, Feb. 28. During the interview, he admitted his company sold a rifle to the Parkland shooter in November, although it wasn’t used in the massacre. “We did everything by the book. We did everything that the law required, and still he was able to buy a gun,” Stack said. “When we looked at that, we said the systems that are in place across the board just aren’t effective enough to keep us from selling a gun like that.

The move was inspired, in part, by the brave students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School who’ve made passionate calls for action in the wake of the shooting. “When we look at what those kids and the parents and the heroes in the school, what they did, our view was: If the kids can be brave enough to organize like this, we can be brave enough to get these [firearms] out of here,” Stack said. 

Dick’s has a history of looking out for the interests of America’s youth. In 2014, the retailer launched a $25 million commitment to help fund youth sports across the country. It also created a campaign on Donors Choose where it will match up to $1.5 million in donations to help public and charter school sports teams. 

 



from GOOD http://ift.tt/2F3Dsvu
via IFTTT

The judge who Trump called a ‘hater’ just ruled in favor of the border wall.

On the campaign trail, President Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel was incapable of being fair because the Indiana-born judge is Latino.

Well, that same judge just made it a lot easier for the president to make good on one of his key campaign promises. Curiel ruled on Tuesday that Homeland Security has the authority to waive laws requiring an environmental review of the border wall project.

Last September, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed suit against the Trump administration to block the construction of the wall along California’s southern border, arguing that federal authorities had not complied with environmental regulations. The Sierra Club and other groups joined in, asking Curiel to halt construction until the Department of Homeland Security was in compliance.

Curiel also presided over a suit against Trump University, which was settled for $25 million after the 2016 election. In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper in June 2016, then-presidential candidate Trump said, “[Curiel’s] a Mexican. We’re building a wall between here and Mexico. The answer is, he is giving us very unfair rulings.”

What’s the president saying about Curiel now? “Big legal win today. U.S. judge sided with the Trump Administration,” he tweeted. Apparently, siding with the president is what makes you an American.

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline The judge who Trump called a ‘hater’ just ruled in favor of the border wall. on Feb 28, 2018.



from Grist http://ift.tt/2EZIauf
via IFTTT

Climate change will hit some key California crops.

How design for disposability and convenience will bury us in waste


This is a series where I take my lectures presented as adjunct professor teaching sustainable design at Ryerson University School of Interior Design in Toronto and distill them down to a sort of Pecha Kucha slideshow of the essentials.

Building up to and during the Second World War, aluminum production capacity in the States was vastly increased to churn out airplanes. Dams were built to generate electricity specifically for making aluminum (which is sometimes known as solid electricity because it takes so much to make it).

After the war, there was more aluminum production capacity and electrical power than anyone knew what to do with. There were huge numbers of planes to recycle, the production facilities were idled, the electricity was going unused. How would they use up all that aluminum? Bucky Fuller tried building houses but that didn't take off. Something had to be done.



from Latest Items from TreeHugger http://ift.tt/2FEB3EN
via IFTTT

Serving The Impossible Burger, a meat-centric restauranteur's perspective

While they do serve a (reportedly very good!) veggie burger named after Joan Jett, Bull City Burger and Brewery in Durham, NC, is not normally thought of as a destination eatery for vegetarians. Whether it's the beef burger-centric menu or the annual exotic meat month (featured meats include kangaroo, alligator, reindeer and bugs), the focus is most definitely on a carnivorous cuisine.

That said, like their much more vegan-friendly sister restaurant Pompieri Pizza—which earned an honorary mention from me for phasing out plastic straws and promoting reusable takeout containers—BCBB has always had an interest in sustainability, local food and lessening its environmental footprint. Having installed LED lighting, reclaimed wood furniture, eliminated unnecessary waste, supported more than 30 local beef farmers (2 of whom they saved from bankruptcy!), and aggressively measured their energy consumption, BCBB is about to embark on another adventure:

They are now serving the much talked about Impossible Burger—a meat-like, plant-based patty that's said to be so realistic it 'bleeds'. So what's it like for a meat-centric eatery to serve the new breed of plant-based meat analogs? I sat down with owner Seth Gross to find out:

"I've been trying to get my hands on this thing since I read about it two years ago. It's not that we are turning our back on grass-fed beef, but we aim to be the go-to destination for all burger lovers here in The Triangle. So we wanted our vegetarian and vegan neighbors to be able to have something special here too. Impossible Foods recently reached out and let us know they are finally in a position to scale up their production and connect with distributors. As far as I know, we are the first restaurant in the region to serve it."

Asked what the challenges are to serving The Impossible Burger, Seth is pretty open: Firstly, as a restaurant serving so much meat, they've had to rework their stations in the kitchen to make sure there's no cross contamination with meat or dairy. (If you want it vegan, you'll need to order it as a lettuce wrap for now. BCBB's house-made buns contain cottage cheese.) Secondly, the price is currently pretty high. While local, grass-fed beef is often three times the price of regular ground beef, The Impossible Burger currently costs BCBB three times more again at wholesale prices:

"We often have the impression that eating plant-based is cheaper, but that's not always the case when it comes to these meat analogs. Our beef burgers start at $7.75 with the base toppings, but we're going to have to charge $12.95 for The Impossible Burger. I'll be interested to see if there's demand at that price point, especially among the 'flexitarian' crowd that Impossible Foods is aiming to convert."

Seth Gross bull photo© Bull City Burger and Brewery

Early reports are that there is definitely an interest, with a fair few local residents expressing excitement on social media that they could finally test the hype. And, when I came in to try it on a Tuesday, staff were reporting mostly positive reactions, feedback and reviews. One vegetarian did report that it was much too meat like for their taste, a sentiment also echoed by one of Seth's vegan back-of-house staff. But Seth is now watching to see if early curiosity turns into long-term demand:

"In just two days we have sold over 50 Impossible burgers to adventurous and curious customers. There has been a lot of buzz about this burger and an excitement to try it. We have been very impressed with the number of people trekking in for a taste. I can't wait to start getting all the feedback from customers to see if it's a keeper."

For my part, I concur with much of what Katherine said in her review, and Robert Llewellyn said in his. It was a pretty enjoyable eating experience, but not quite a slam-dunk replica for BCBB's pasture raised beef. The crispy, savory crust was pleasing. And the pink, juicy center was also more interesting than your usual, somewhat dry soy-based protein patties. Yet there's something about the texture—still a little mushy—and a strong, maybe overly salty aftertaste which give it away as being not-quite meat. (A BCBB representative did emphasize that they are experimenting with how to cook it, and may cut back on seasoning.)

Finally, with 13g of fat (10g of that saturated), and 430mg of sodium, you'd be hard pressed to call this a health food. But it is cholesterol-free. And as someone who has radically cut my meat intake in an effort to curb cholesterol, and reduce my environmental impact, I would definitely go this route if given the choice between a fast food or dive bar burger and The Impossible.

Whether I'll switch from the very occasional delicious, pasture-raised burger at BCBB, however, that's a whole other question. And that's something that Seth and I discuss in some detail—the idea that meat ought to always be a central part of our plates is, he argues, a weird notion that we would all do better moving away from:

"When my family goes out to eat, we find ourselves eating more and more vegetarian because if we do not know if the meat is pasture-raised we will not support a broken food system that is harmful to animals, the planet and ultimately to us. I feel we should all embrace fresh vegetables and grains, and only add in happy meat occasionally and when we can afford to. We support the real price of food and real farmers who grow it and raise it."



from Latest Items from TreeHugger http://ift.tt/2HTxkDV
via IFTTT

Dwyane Wade Is Saddened That A Parkland Shooting Victim Was Buried In His Jersey

THE GOOD NEWS:

Dwyane Wade honored the students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School without side-stepping the gun control debate.

 

As a star athlete, it must be impossible to grasp the effect you have on people’s lives. On Sunday, Feb. 25, Miami Heat legend Dwyane Wade learned he was a hero to one of the 17 people who died in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida.

According to Univision, one of the victims of the shooting, 17-year-old Joaquin Oliver, was laid to rest in his Dwyane Wade jersey. Wade was obviously upset by the news.

On Saturday, Feb. 24, the Heat played their first home game since the shooting. Miami is about 50 miles from Parkland, Florida, so the team held a pre-game memorial featuring a Marjory Stoneman Douglas flag at center court. Wade was able to share some heartfelt words with the audience while making an appeal for improved gun safety.

“Tonight we honor the 17 lives that were tragically lost in Parkland,” Wade said. “We applaud the fearless students who are fighting for their lives, and we also want to make sure that their voices are heard about gun safety. You are our nation’s inspiration, we salute you and we support you.”

While some athletes would have side-stepped the controversial gun control debate and just honored the students, Wade took a stance, and it wasn’t the first time. In 2016, Wade’s cousin was gunned down in Chicago, and he used his celebrity to promote gun safety in the city. “There’s other cities that have way tougher gun laws. We have weak gun laws,” Wade said.



from GOOD http://ift.tt/2FEbO5q
via IFTTT

Knicks Fan Jon Stewart Appeared Tortured When This Opposing Player Sank A Shot


Sports

Knicks Fan Jon Stewart Appeared Tortured When This Opposing Player Sank A Shot

February 28, 2018 at 12:50

Being a true fan means not only celebrating the highs but enduring a team’s worst moments as well — and when the lackluster New York Knicks recently hosted the Golden State Warriors juggernaut at Madison Square Garden, former ‘Daily Show’ host Jon Stewart showed the world what the latter looked like. Following a very ill-advised but ultimately successful turnaround jump shot by Golden State’s JaVale McGee, the funnyman in attendance registered the pain in a hilariously visible fashion. 

Many celebrities attending sporting events like to put on their coolest, most stoic poker face, lest the camera catches them in anguish or exhilaration. But it quickly became apparent that Jon Stewart isn’t that type of celebrity. 

Unless Jon Stewart was experiencing other issues in concert with the Knicks’ struggles, he might be overselling the drama here. I mean: 

It didn’t take long for sports media to use this reaction to illustrate the pain that all Knicks fans experience during their woebegone decades. 

Later that night, JaVale McGee, seemingly pleased at the anguish he was able to cause a fan of the opposition, made Stewart’s pained face his Twitter profile pic: 

Many see athletic success as a zero-sum game — and it’s pretty clear from this series of events that Jon Stewart’s tragedy is JaVale McGee’s triumph. 

Share image via Elsa/Getty Images.



from GOOD http://ift.tt/2F9EjdE
via IFTTT

The Selfie Olympics: What’s The Impact Of Social Media On Performance?


There has always been a symbiotic relationship between media, sports, and athletes. Sports provides content for media, which in turn promotes the performances of athletes. But the advent of social media has disrupted this traditional connection.

Rather than relying solely on media to be the gatekeeper of sports news and information, athletes are now controlling their own narratives through Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook.

At the Olympic Games, this has become the new normal for keeping up with athletes. But does the use of social media help or hinder an athlete’s performances at the Olympics?

Social media offers a host of benefits for athletes. They are able to stay connected with friends and family, interact with fans, and allow spectators to feel part of the action while also capturing invaluable memories.

Most of the research concerning athletes’ use of social media centres on its marketing advantage. In Sport Marketing Quarterly, researchers recommended athletes engage more with fans and share information about their lives to better leverage marketing opportunities. Similarly, Ryerson University professor Katie Lebel and her colleague examined how athletes presented themselves on Twitter and determined it to be an extension of the athlete’s brand, providing a means for them to build and promote themselves.

Social media is a marketing tool

While social media may assist athletes with sports marketing, ultimately performance is the most important factor for any Olympian. What is the relationship between social media and performance? Currently, little research exists to help answer this question.

As an Olympian, researcher, and consultant in sport psychology, I am intrigued by this phenomenon and am currently conducting a study in this area on the Pyeongchang Games.

The field of sport psychology is concerned with understanding the psychosocial factors that positively and negatively influence performances of athletes, as well as the strategies that will promote excellence.

Specifically, researchers have been able to identify the characteristics which distinguish successful Olympians from those less successful. In a study examining the development of Olympic champions, Daniel Gould, Kristen Dieffenbach, and Aaron Moffet found athletes to have a high degree of confidence, mental toughness, optimism, and were goal oriented and students of their sport. These athletes were also able to block out distractions and control their level of anxiety.

The U.S. figure skating team team pose for a selfie on the podium after their third place finish at the 2018 Winter Olympics. Photo by Julie Jacobson/AP Photo.

Comparatively, many studies have found media exposure to be an Achilles’ heel for sport performance, negatively affecting athletes at the Olympics. For example, a survey of Winter Olympians published in the Journal of Sports Sciences found media to be one of four major sources of stress. Likewise, athletes competing in the Atlanta Summer Games and Nagano Winter Games identified media as a factor which negatively impacted their performance.

The negative impact on performance

One of a few studies exploring the use of social networking sites by athletes found a large majority of athletes used Facebook in the two hours before their sport competition, with many using it during the competition. More importantly, they determined sport anxiety to increase when athletes spent time on Facebook prior to competition. Elevated sport anxiety can bring a wide array of other negative consequences like fear of failure and choking.

In an effort to combat the negative effect media can have on performance, some athletes will engage in a “media diet” or a blackout period. This may involve decreasing interaction with the media or directing all media requests to a team manager.

This is what I did when I competed at the Olympic Games and other major events. It allowed me to control my environment and my emotions. It is very easy for an athlete to shift their focus to the thoughts and opinions of others, taking them away from what it is they should be focusing on.

For example, self-efficacy — the belief one has in their ability — can be easily influenced by what others tell an athlete.

The impacts of positive and negative feedback

If an athlete is receiving positive feedback, their self-efficacy can be elevated. If they are receiving negative commentary, their belief in their ability can be compromised. This means fans and those trolling social networking sites have the subtle power to influence the mental state of an athlete.

However, in this new era of social media perhaps this new generation of athletes are developing skills that enable them to better manage social media’s negative impact.

U.S. snowboarder Chloe Kim tweeted her frustration of not finishing her breakfast sandwich and feeling hangry during the halfpipe competition. She ended up winning gold. On the other hand, Cate Campbell from Australia was not so fortunate in the 100m freestyle at the Rio Olympics. The world record holder would finish sixth in the finals after receiving a message from a friend.

For athletes like U.S. figure skater Adam Rippon, social media can allow them to win the hearts of spectators. For others, like Canada’s Gabrielle Daleman (who violated her own social media diet at the Olympics), it can be a gateway for bullies.

The verdict is still out as to whether most athletes can use social media during the Olympic Games and still perform well. For now, I would recommend athletes go on a media diet to control their environment and feelings as much as possible. Why give anyone the opportunity to have power over you after years of training for this one moment in time?

Nicole W. Forrester, Assistant Professor, School of Media, Ryerson University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Top and share image by Charlie Riedel/AP Photo.



from GOOD http://ift.tt/2oyWVdi
via IFTTT

Sturgis tiny house is built with sturdy & renewable cross-laminated timber (Video)

The tiny house movement has come a long way in the last decade or so, having evolved from its rustic, DIY roots into a flourishing field where we're seeing a lot of tiny homes using innovative materials and building systems, as well as prefabricated, high-tech smart tiny housing units.

Cubist Engineering is offering this 170-square-foot modern gem of a tiny house that's built with one of our favourite materials: cross-laminated timber. CLT has been popular in Europe for decades, and is now making its presence known in North America -- it's a strong material that is not only lighter than concrete, but also sequesters carbon and is renewable. Here's a quick tour of the 21' by 8' long Sturgis:

Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering
Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering
Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering

As the company explains, the use of CLT from SmartLam allows them to gain almost a foot of extra width, as CLT is strong but light:

In our CLT buildings, the walls, floor and roof are all solid wood panels, up to 3.25 inches thick. CLT panels consist of lumber glued together to form a big sheet; then multiple sheets, oriented perpendicular to each other, are glued together in a massive press. The more layers, the stronger the structure. Our buildings are structurally engineered to withstand the most stringent building codes, as well as drive down the road at 70mph.

Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering

Clad with shou sugi ban wood siding on the outside, and white oak wood flooring and reclaimed white oak trim inside, the Sturgis' airy interior boasts one big space-saving trick we are now familiar with in tiny spaces: a retractable queen-sized bed that can be lowered down from the ceiling with the push of a button.

Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering

The kitchen sits in the centre, and is outfitted with plenty of storage, a two-burner induction cooktop, and an under-counter refrigerator and freezer. The bathroom has been designed as a 4’ by 8’ wet spa bath. The frosted glass makes the space feel more continuous and therefore larger.

Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering
Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering
Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering

There's also what the company calls its “obsession space”: a raised platform located on one end of the unit, which has its own remote-controlled gullwing door. Seems a bit over the top, but the company envisions it acting as a display case and storage unit for prized things: perhaps a nice work of art, a walk-in closet, a wine cellar, or a mini-garage for a motorcycle or some mountain bikes. If anything, it's basically an extra-large storage space.

Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering
Cubist Engineering© Cubist Engineering

The Sturgis doesn't come cheap at a base price of USD $99,000. But as the idea of creating functional, livable and well-designed small spaces becomes more mainstream, it's an encouraging thought that more innovative and eco-friendly materials will be at least integrated into the mix, as we've seen here. Get a more detailed look at the Sturgis' specifications, or visit Cubist Engineering.

[Via: Inhabitat]



from Latest Items from TreeHugger http://ift.tt/2HUmDRG
via IFTTT

College Republicans have a climate change plan, even if their representatives don’t

The chasm between congressional Republicans and Democrats on green issues is widening, according to the annual scorecard released this week by the League of Conservation Voters. The advocacy group evaluated how each member of Congress voted on environmental legislation in 2017. Senate Republicans had an average all-time low score of 1 percent — “meaning they voted against the environment and public health” 99 percent of the time. Their party members in the House didn’t do much better, going green only 5 percent of the time, on average. Democrats, on the other hand, netted an average mark of 94 percent in the House and 93 percent in the Senate on the scorecard.

But not all American conservatives feel the same way about the environment as the ones sitting in Congress. Take college Republicans, for instance.

On Wednesday, a coalition of Republican, Democrat, and environmental groups from public and private colleges and universities across the United States unveiled a plan to tackle climate change. It’s the first time college Republicans have publicly backed a national climate policy. The Students for Carbon Dividends (S4CD) is a group of 33 student-led clubs that aim to harness the power of their academic institutions to shine a national spotlight on the climate.

“S4CD makes clear to our fellow young Republicans that we no longer need to choose between party orthodoxy and the mounting risks facing our planet,” says Kiera O’Brien, vice president of S4CD and a sophomore at Harvard University.

A growing number of Republicans embrace the scientific consensus on human-made warming, and many of them support market-based methods of curbing pollution and expanding renewable energy. Millennials, especially, are broadly concerned about climate change. A new poll from the nonprofit Alliance for Market Solutions found that roughly three out of four millennials agree humans should curb climate change — and a surprising 51 percent of young conservatives are concerned about the issue.

S4CD’s platform centers on a carbon-dividends tax pioneered by the Climate Leadership Council, an international policy institute whose founding members include former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and British astrophysicist Stephen Hawking. The tax is known in conservative circles as the Baker-Shultz Plan — named after former Secretaries of State, James Baker and George Shultz.

It would put a rising price on fossil fuels in order to limit consumption and decrease pollution. The money generated by the tax goes back to Americans through an annual carbon dividend: for an average family of four, that would come in the form of a yearly $2,000 check. The plan also includes a “border adjustment” — penalties on incoming products from foreign countries that haven’t adopted a similar tax plan.

By championing this carbon-tax plan and reminding the Republican Party of its conservationist roots, college Republicans hope to get lawmakers in Congress to go a little greener. But to move their elected officials, S4CD will also have to contend with the fossil fuel industry. Oil companies and a range of well-funded lobbying groups have spent decades and billions of dollars fighting climate change legislation. And they have tremendous sway over many conservative politicians, including the current head of the EPA, Scott Pruitt.

Alex Posner, a senior at Yale University and founding president of S4CD, thinks those industry attitudes toward climate policy are starting to shift. “We’re in kind of a unique moment: What makes most sense for business — a clear predictable price on carbon — is also the policy that almost all economists agree is the most effective way to drive emissions reductions,” he says. “There’s this synergy of interests that’s rare in the climate space.”

It might sound like an uphill battle for a group of adolescents to get congressional Republicans mobilized in the fight against climate change. But, according to Posner, most elected officials have yet to feel the true power of the students involved in the coalition. After all, many of them haven’t had a chance to vote.

“We haven’t had much say over political positions in the past or present,” Posner says. “Our goal is to have a say over the political positions of the future.”

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline College Republicans have a climate change plan, even if their representatives don’t on Feb 28, 2018.



from Grist http://ift.tt/2F3Z0V7
via IFTTT

World's first plastic-free supermarket aisle debuts in Amsterdam


To start with, more than 700 products will be available without plastic packaging in the designated section.

Today marks a milestone in the fight against plastic pollution. At 11 o'clock local time, a supermarket in Amsterdam called Ekoplaza opened the first-ever plastic-free aisle. The aisle features more than 700 food items, including meats, sauces, yogurts, cereals, and chocolate; and, as unbelievable as it sounds, there's not a speck of plastic in sight -- only cardboard, glass, metal, and compostable materials.

Sian Sutherland is the co-founder of A Plastic Planet, the environmental organization behind supermarket chain Ekoplaza's initiative to rid its shelves of plastic. She is celebrating today, calling it a "landmark moment for the global fight against plastic pollution." She told the Guardian:

"For decades shoppers have been sold the lie that we can’t live without plastic in food and drink. A plastic-free aisle dispels all that. Finally we can see a future where the public have a choice about whether to buy plastic or plastic-free. Right now we have no choice."

Ekoplaza CEO Erik Does says this is something his company has been working on for years, that it's "not just a marketing trick." The company plans to add plastic-free aisles to all of its 74 stores by the end of 2018.

What's interesting about the plastic-free aisle concept is that the products are still packaged, only in better, more eco-friendly versions of packaging. I suspect it will do extremely well because most shoppers value convenience above all else. Many cannot be bothered to remember their own containers or bags for filling at a bulk food store, but dislike the idea of hauling all that extra plastic home. This offers the perfect middle ground.

It's not entirely accurate for Sutherland to say that plastic-free choices did not exist before. They did, and continue to exist in every other supermarket; it just takes time, stubbornness, and money to sniff them out. For example, I can buy plastic mesh bags of 5 avocados for $4, or loose avocados at $2 apiece. Peanut butter in plastic is $4.99, whereas it's $6.99 in a smaller glass jar. The choice is there, but it's not a convenient one, which is why the plastic-free aisle should do well.

The good news is that campaigners say the products will not be any more expensive than plastic-wrapped goods. (That seems surprising, but great if it's actually the case.) The Guardian reports that items will be "scalable and convenient, using alternative biodegradable packing where necessary rather than ditching packaging altogether."

Don't confuse a plastic-free aisle with zero-waste shopping, however. The two concepts are quite different, and zero waste advocates would likely point out that a plastic-free aisle still results in excessive and unnecessary packaging that must go through the recycling process (which we know is fairly useless) or into the trash, neither of which is desirable. Reduction and avoidance should be our ultimate goal.

Nevertheless, kudos to Ekoplaza and A Plastic Planet for their fabulous work on this front. This is only the beginning of a major shift in the way people buy their food. Learn more in the short video below.



from Latest Items from TreeHugger http://ift.tt/2sZsPnY
via IFTTT

12 ways to get rid of slugs naturally

Get rid of slugs (and snails) without the use of pesticides that harm beneficial creatures and pollute our waterways. from Latest Items f...